The design space across pattern × copy × color × icon × position is large. This page samples 1,000 stable points from it. Most of them are wrong on purpose. The winners are highlighted. The kills are dimmed. The shipped X pattern is in there. One variant rotates as Today's pick, deterministic by date - so the page is fresh every visit, never random.
Nikita Bier posted the new Grok tooltip pattern, and X shipped it: tapping the Grok affordance on a post now opens a tooltip with Summarize this, Is this true?, Explain this, Open in Grok. That is variant 037 in this grid, marked Best in class. This case study was built before that shipped - the convergence isn't a coincidence, it's the same product logic landing in two places at once. Today's pick rotates daily through the remaining 1,000 variants. Today is variant --.
This isn't decoration. The design space is the argument. Showing the variants I rejected makes the choice I shipped defensible - it lets you see the failure modes I avoided.
Five winners, each representing a different cognitive load level. Twelve hard kills - patterns that broke the brand, broke trust, or broke focus. The remaining 983 are tradeoffs across the design space, sampled deterministically so you see a different cross-section every visit.
The other 95 each broke at least one principle. The kills are the loudest signal in the grid.